Tuesday, September 2, 2008

A reflection on McCain's decision making process

The controversy surrounding Palin's choice gives us an interesting opportunity to examine McCain's decision making process. This thought has nothing to do with Palin's daughter being pregnant because I could absolutely care less. However, this does relate to the fact that McCain's choice seems to have been made hastily and purely for political reasons. They seemed to have missed her entanglement in ethics investigations, and were willing to overlook an extremely slim political resume. Furthermore, McCain has almost a non-existent relationship with Palin. Current reporting says that McCain first met Palin in Feburary, held one phone call a week later, and then didn't speak to her again until days before offering her the VP. In what seems to be a continuing pattern, the Republican party seems overly willing to settle for short term political gains (the shock of selecting a woman) that may jeopardize future political situations (her complete lack of experience). Seeing our current political situations domestically and abroad, a president's decision making process is all the more important. I may be looking too far into this, but given the lack of substantive reporting, I find myself analyzing anything I can. 

7 comments:

jim kitchens said...

THis story will last for weeks to come. Everyone want to find out something newsworthy about her.

jim kitchens said...

A p.s. to my comment. I have put a brief comment on my blog, Kitchens' Think, about this situation. Please feel free to comment.

Katy C. said...

I think, for me, one of the most surprising things about Palin's selection was mentioned in this article:

http://www.slate.com/id/2199029/

It takes away the experience argument that McCain has been using against Obama. I understand some of the pros for picking Palin, but she seems to come with a ton of cons.

carl said...

I would like to briefly clarify my earlier point. My major concern is that his VP choice seems to have been a politically motivated, "gut" decision. Despite what appears to be a complete lack of contact, and knowledge of Palin, McCain made a serious political choice. Now, the McCain camp simply describes McCain and Palin's meetings as "love at first sight". This sincerely makes me nervous because the last eight years we have had a president that has followed his "gut". What I want to see is the ability to thoughtfully reflect and judge a situation in the face of political pressure. I want to see a thoughtful decision, not a hasty decision. That is what I didn't see in McCain's choice for theoretically the second most powerful person in the country.

Katy C. said...

The 'gut decision' point is a good one. This article makes some interesting points about that:

http://www.slate.com/id/2199058/

Maybe his campaign just couldn't tone down his usual impulsiveness. Although the thought of having someone as president who is impulsive is a little worrying...

Ben the Blogger said...

Hmm, I think there is a difference between saying the decision is to shift back to "gut" based politics that lacks content and saying the decision replicates some of the success from the Bush/Cheney runs.
For those, like me, that just can't read enough about the Palin selection, I thought Joe Trippi (the dude behind Dean 2004) had an insightful piece:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/dems_shouldnt_underestimate_pa.html
Particularly interesting is the notion that McCain can use Palin's inexperience to insinuate that, well, if you aren't ready for number 2 after 2 year as a Gov, are you really ready for number 1 after 4 years in the Senate? He also outlines an interesting potential strategy McCain could be plotting to challenge the "change" message. Though it sounds like the word "plotting" may give McCain a bit too much credit, it still seems awful half-hazard.

Anonymous said...

Hi all: You saw Jim Kitchens' post above -- I am excited that Jim is able to join us some on the blog, and that he will begin class with us tomorrow. You might remember last week when I talked about an academic-gone-real time political consultant/pollster in Florida, and that is Jim. You might check out his website (thekitchensgroup.com) before class tomorrow. He is working on some interesting races in the current cycle, and brings a "real world" perspective that is grounded in political comm theory, which will be very valuable. He will also join us for a class session via the phone after the election for a "post-mortem" and to begin our discussion on the political brain. Cheers.